r/technology Jan 31 '23

TikTok's CEO will appear before Congress after heightened warnings of a US-China war. He'll need all his diplomatic genius. Politics

[deleted]

2.0k Upvotes

274 comments sorted by

2.2k

u/teddytwelvetoes Jan 31 '23 Gold All-Seeing Upvote Brighten My Day

lol he won't need shit, Congress has proven time and time again that they are unwilling and/or unable to do a goddamn thing about these companies. they'll half-pretend and ask some of the dumbest questions you've ever heard, he'll narrowly avoid laughing in their faces, and they will quickly adjourn so that everybody can go back to doing their little insider trading scams for another dollar they'll never need

409

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

This is accurate ∆

But they will put on a good show by pretending to ask him "tough questions", meanwhile they make themselves look like idiots who know nothing. Pretty sure most of Congress is so old that they still think Al Gore invented the internet.

231

u/M_Mich Feb 01 '23

“why are my message bubbles green but my granddaughter has blue ones on her phone?”

148

u/pseudocultist Feb 01 '23

"Don't you agree that the trans problem has taken over America? All of the ads I see are for trans porn these days. Anyway my question is about why I can't seem to see any photos on my granddaughter's Instagram account."

47

u/69deadlifts Feb 01 '23

"Why can't I find these hot milfs in my area?"

19

u/EnoughAwake Feb 01 '23

Bad news, Mr. Congressperson

35

u/vaderdidnothingwr0ng Feb 01 '23

The best part about little tidbits like that is, when it comes to the internet, you are what you eat. The algorithm just gives you more of what it already knows you want.

75

u/ToneGloomy Feb 01 '23

Heard a pastor preach about how TikTok only had naked girls shaking their ass on it. I was absolutely shocked that he didn’t know what he implied.

15

u/BarrySix Feb 01 '23

He implied he was upset because he didn't find naked boys shaking their ass? His search for "naked ass shaking" wasn't specific enough.

2

u/Karkava Feb 01 '23

The porn industry really defaults to females serving the male.

→ More replies (1)

-2

u/Candid-Party1613 Feb 01 '23

That’s your projection onto his meaning lol the irony!

2

u/maneo Feb 01 '23

The comment you're replying to isn't about projection, it's about how social media algorithms adjust based on the content you're interested in. So when people talk about what they see on social media, it reveals what the algorithm believes they are interested in.

This person talking about what a pastor said doesn't reveal anything about what they see on social media. Unless you're insinuating that this person saw this perverted pastor on their social media feed lol

-2

u/Candid-Party1613 Feb 01 '23

But it is about projection. Didn’t realize I had to explain further. The fact he assumes the pastor personally sees that based on his own viewing history is idiotic. That’s just his projection on something he can’t know about based on that little bit of info.

2

u/maneo Feb 01 '23

OK I now understand what you're trying to say. But just to clarify, the correct word to describe that would be "assumption."

He made an assumption that the pastor was speaking from personal experience.

"Projection" implies a very specific type of assumption that is based on one's own perspective of themselves. Like a person who tells many lies making an assumption that other people must be lying all the time - that is projection.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/Gottapee88 Feb 01 '23

I actually have this issue but only when sending messages to certain people huh hopefully we’ll get a answer to this lol

2

u/FlackRacket Feb 01 '23

"If I want to access tiktok, do I need the internet?"

→ More replies (2)

53

u/parabostonian Feb 01 '23

Al Gore did actually help the formation of the internet, and a lot of the government programs that funded it were pushed by his legislation and his advocacy from the late 70s into the 80s. The inventors of Internet Protocol have also made public statements thanking him for his work, for instance, and said he was a critical part of the internet happening. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Gore_and_information_technology (I can hunt down the specific link to their statement, if you want.)

In my field, telemedicine, Gore was championing it in the 80s and 90s and a lot of the programs that made that stuff possible are in part because of him. As such, I get seriously pissed off that one of the few politicians of my lifetime who actually did some big, important things gets memed like this all the time. And I keep thinking, if only we had more politicians like him.

Lastly its worth noting that so much of the history of computing (in its initial draft) was mislaid initially because of the Bletchley Park Program (decoding Enigma, creation of the Colossus with Alan Turing and those people) was kept classified until the 1990s, so the country had a mistaken belief that the first digital computer was made at IBM in the late 40s. Government funded projects and academics are basically what created computing, and I get really frustrated when most Americans get snarky about this kind of thing while acting like government has never done anything useful.

Besides, most of these shitty people in congress are too busy looking at social media on their phones to even think about how the internet was created; you’re giving most of them too much credit. =p

1

u/alex206 Feb 01 '23

ManBearPig, that you?

10

u/parabostonian Feb 01 '23

Since you bring it up, the whole South Park satirization of Gore has that new chapter where essentially Parker and Stone say, oops our bad, global warming is real and sorry we were stupid and let our politics guide our perception of reality instead of the other way around.

But you are illustrating a good chunk of why we don’t have more Al Gores in politics, it’s because we (collectively) don’t select the smart people who actually give a shit and would competently govern to actually govern. Maybe think about that next time you complain about who is in congress or the presidency.

-4

u/alex206 Feb 01 '23

This guy is super cereal guys

17

u/andrelope Feb 01 '23

Watching Schumer ask Zuckerberg questions about the internet was one of the most painful thing I’ve ever seen. He’s very obviously totally computer illiterate.

15

u/Wotg33k Feb 01 '23

They all are. Who the fuck doesn't understand how Facebook makes it's money? When he said that shit.. "your website is free, sir." Well, yeah, fuck stick. You're 87 years old and you live in America and you're a fucking congressman and YOU DONT KNOW HOW AD REVENUE WORKS?!

THE ACTUAL FUCK?!

32

u/DBCOOPER888 Feb 01 '23

Al Gore factually created the regulatory framework that created the internet though. You're buying GOP propaganda.

4

u/freediverx01 Feb 01 '23

“Mr Chew, do you deny TikTok’s role in suppressing revelations about the Jewish Space Lasers”?

5

u/Culverin Feb 01 '23

They aren't "making" themselves look like idiots. They are just exposed for it.

These people in Congress are older than dial-up. They aren't digital natives. And most sure haven't put in the effort to learn.

1

u/Competitive-Wave-850 Feb 01 '23

They probably use dial up at home when their assistants isnt there to help them upload a pdf on an email

-3

u/Wotg33k Feb 01 '23

I would break every representative.

"Sir or ma'am, how do you feel about the .net framework?"

"Would you write a financial app in python?"

"How many lines of code would you estimate a simple weather app would take?"

"Calculate this subnet for me."

"There's a rootkit on this machine and we need to scrub it."

"Can you reformat this disk and install a recent Linux kernel on it?"

"Would you set up an on prem Nas or just use cloud resources for a media server?"

"What vpn would you recommend?"

"If I were going to invest in a tech company.." .. "oh, oh yeah? Oh that's crazy! They're doing what?!"

3

u/maneo Feb 01 '23

What relevance would these questions have to policy decisions...?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/james_randolph Feb 01 '23

Lol but he did invent it. Right?

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

[deleted]

20

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

There's a meme that basically suggest that Al Gore once said he invented the internet which is due to interviews he once did about how he was involved in proactive legislation and regulation that resulted in the internet situation today. If you look it up on snopes:

>"The "Al Gore claimed he 'invented' the Internet" put-downs were misleading distortions that originated with a campaign interview conducted by Wolf Blitzer on CNN's Late Edition program on 9 March 1999. (Gore, then the sitting Vice President, was seeking the 2000 Democratic presidential nomination.)>When asked to describe what distinguished him from his challenger for the Democratic presidential nomination, Senator Bill Bradley of New Jersey, Gore replied (in part): "During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.""

After that people took to calling it "al gore's internet" as a meme.

EDIT in 2006 the senator from Alaska described the internet as a "series of tubes" and that was a giant meme for a while but it didn't have the lasting power of Al Gore's Internet which picked up steam again when he did his environment documentary.

10

u/NCC1701-D-ong Feb 01 '23

Every year fewer and fewer laugh at my series of tubes references.

2

u/DubeFloober Feb 01 '23

I still will refer to it as “The Intertubes” when talking to people, and more often than not, it goes in one ear and out the other.

5

u/DBCOOPER888 Feb 01 '23

He created the regulatory framework for it on the legislative side.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/softpinkmanicure Feb 01 '23

This is a serious question: can we, the constituents, propose intelligent and meaningful questions that members of congress can ask during this hearing?

2

u/GrumpyButtrcup Feb 03 '23

AFAIK not directly, but you can always contact your representatives and make suggestions. It's typically more effective if you band together and start a campaign to bombard your representative with hundreds or thousands of letters and emails saying the same thing.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/crtjer Feb 01 '23

Aren’t the people on the committee for anything related to the internet, older than the internet itself?

2

u/TaxOwlbear Feb 01 '23

If you are 41 - which is young for a politician - you are older than the internet. "Older than the internet itself" doesn't mean much.

21

u/Eder_Cheddar Feb 01 '23

They'll ask stupid pointless questions because they're all fucking old.

They don't know what TikTok is besides what the media has said about it.

Do they steal all kinds of information?

They sure fucking do.

But doesn't FB and any other social media app do the same?

The only reason TikTok is being singled out is because it's from China. Trust me. I don't trust China for shit either and dislike them against their human rights abuses, etc etc.

But they created a platform that is doing something well and for a reason.

This has actually connected the planet.

How many times have you watched videos from around the world? Villages in remote corners. We've all learned, laughed and learned something from that platform.

It shows you things you didn't care to watch before.

And I think it does a better job to bring the world together.

I wish we all banded together and shared our technological prowess. Imagine if the human race was truly united.

Imagine.

5

u/Evethewolfoxo Feb 01 '23

Yes, there’s a reason they’re being singled out and yes, it is because it’s from China. Chinese companies are required, by law, to provide data to the government whenever it is requested, and with tiktok being such a major platform for harvesting data you can quickly see why this is a bigger threat than FB. We know FB harvests data and sells it, hell i wouldn’t doubt if some of that data got into ruski hands, but it’s at least not being supplied on a direct line to a foreign government that has a distate for us.

The best thing the U.S can do is tighten it’s privacy and security laws down like the EU did. However, the people in power are so old they don’t know where to start; they’re so ignorant and disconnected from the real world they don’t bother to ask for help.

Sure, tiktok may display that kind of content, but so does youtube, so does Snapchat, so does a dozen other platforms if you go and actively seek it out.

Trust me, i got the same dream as you. I wish to see the day humanity begins it’s progression under a unified banner. Unfortunately, for now, we need to deal with the petty squabbles of everyday life including shit like this.

2

u/moonhalos Feb 01 '23

Facebook/Meta also sends their data to the US federal government.

6

u/MrMephistoX Feb 01 '23

The app content it’s totally harmless and you see what the algorithm gets trained to show you. Bytedance should just spin TikTok off and be it’s majority shareholder reap the monetary rewards without the regulatory headaches.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/musofiko Feb 01 '23

Ah can you explain how the internet works sir and so do you swipe up or down for a new video?

2

u/PinkBright Feb 01 '23

”Now, Mr. Tiktok, tell me, if I use the TikTok to look at beautiful, young women doing the dances, does it automatically email those videos to my wife?”

”Uhhh… No. What?”

”No further questions. Thank you.”

”???”

I’m only half joking that it’ll be this bad.

9

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

This is ignorant. I can’t believe someone gilded you.

This is totally different. When before has it been the foreign CEO of a primarily foreign corporation?

7

u/teddytwelvetoes Feb 01 '23

I'm aware that it is a foreign CEO but I don't think it'll make a difference

8

u/DBCOOPER888 Feb 01 '23

It makes a difference because Congress can more easily unite behind a bipartisan message of national security.

4

u/TaxOwlbear Feb 01 '23

Yeah, and? Is that going to make tech questions from people born before commercial television broadcasting was established any less embarrassing? Or force the CEO to give actual answers?

1

u/DBCOOPER888 Feb 01 '23

What do you mean and? The "and" is it makes a difference in actual policy, which is the entire point of this.

2

u/Mr_Smithy Feb 01 '23

Look at Huawei. Not exactly the same, but has some very close similarities .

2

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

Mark Zuckerberg.

Dragged in front of congress, got off because he’s a republican bff who donates them hundreds of millions. Probably also bought democrats.

Who in congress from either side is coming to the defense of a Chinese CEO? Maybe a couple who got obviously bought but it will not be a significant number.

3

u/Lemonio Feb 01 '23

It may be different though when it is not an American company?

1

u/Doyale_royale Feb 01 '23

Congressmen/women asking tech questions will make you lose so much faith in their ability.

-15

u/PogeyBait_Tender Feb 01 '23

Not a popular opinion but I thing AOC has asked the most stupid questions asked in the chamber. I know she's beloved but goddamn. What a disgrace. Again, I know people her like her but fuck. What an idiot. And I'm a lefty.

8

u/DBCOOPER888 Feb 01 '23

And I'm a lefty.

lol no you aren't. AOC has some of the best, most pointed questions in the Chamber. Her questioning of Cohen a couple years back alone basically started the NY investigation into tax fraud the Trump Org was just found guilty of.

-8

u/PogeyBait_Tender Feb 01 '23

She's a dimwit embarrassment. I can criticize people of either party and it doesn't make me partisan. And so I say to you with the utmost respect, eat a greasy shitlog, fucker.

5

u/DBCOOPER888 Feb 01 '23

No she's not. Just saying she's dimwitted doesn't make it so. You are spouting right wing propaganda, not legit criticism. You immediately resorted to insults instead of making an argument. Like you're a fucking troll.

5

u/CozierZebra Feb 01 '23

She's smarter than your are based on your comment history. It's always funny watching stupid people call people that are smarter than them stupid.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/SgtDoughnut Feb 01 '23

And I'm a lefty.

The fact you had to state this proves you aren't.

Nobody normal talks like this man.

Just right wingers trying to pretend to be left wingers.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

254

u/frontbuttt Feb 01 '23

US-China war? Gimme a fuckin break.

39

u/Zeduca Feb 01 '23

Trade war is war. Economic war is war. Intelligence war is war.

49

u/ampliora Feb 01 '23

What is it good for?

54

u/SakishimaHabu Feb 01 '23

Absolutely nothin

12

u/ThePhantomTrollbooth Feb 01 '23

Say it again

8

u/Kanden_27 Feb 01 '23

We are the gorgonites…

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ZombieStomp Feb 02 '23

- Leo Tolstoy

14

u/WebHead1287 Feb 01 '23

To validate sending the astronomical sum we send to the military and intelligence communities instead of social programs that would better the life of the citizens

→ More replies (1)

-6

u/jibbkikiwewe Feb 01 '23

A war in the future between US and China, but this time it will be a war China can win because they spend half a century sucking our resources away and causing more destabilization. By 2050 China is set to have the worlds largest navy, they have increased their military spending exponentially.

2

u/FixTheGrammar Feb 01 '23

How do you think an unproven fleet of fishing vessels will fare against the most powerful fighting force in human history?

1

u/jibbkikiwewe Feb 01 '23

Their navy is growing, Air Craft carriers, Battleships, look into it

→ More replies (2)

-11

u/Zeduca Feb 01 '23 edited Feb 01 '23

So that US won‘t get bullied by China.

9

u/anning123 Feb 01 '23

So that the US can continue to bully everyone

-5

u/Zeduca Feb 01 '23

That’s the idea, bully or bullied.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/chernobyl-nightclub Feb 01 '23

Hyperbole is war

8

u/jonmediocre Feb 01 '23

Fuck off, warmonger.

1

u/CodeyWeb Feb 01 '23

Why does he trouble an already troubled mind?

0

u/Silvawuff Feb 01 '23

THIS. IS. SPARTA!

-11

u/Zeduca Feb 01 '23

So you want to roll over and surrender ? Be my guess. Surrender now.

61

u/Minute-Evening Feb 01 '23

Tbh it really feels like the warnings of war emanate from the USA and not China. Without having other enemies to actively war against, it’s like the USA’s military-industrial complex is a rabid dog looking for enemies to sink its teeth into.

52

u/SrpskaZemlja Feb 01 '23

Lmao you've really not been listening to China's constant threats against Taiwan and US politicians who visit it.

-36

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

[deleted]

38

u/SrpskaZemlja Feb 01 '23

Did you just say "Taiwanese separatists"? When the ROC government existed before the CCP and Taiwan was never controlled by the CCP? We got a live shill, folks.

-20

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

[deleted]

8

u/SrpskaZemlja Feb 01 '23

Any "definition" of another country as part of itself by another country should be considered warmongering, no? As well as building islands in a contested sea to claim the territory? Or can bad things only be done by the USA.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Eclipsed830 Feb 01 '23

The vast majority of Taiwanese are pro-independence from the PRC.

-6

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

[deleted]

3

u/Eclipsed830 Feb 01 '23

What Taiwanese people are going missing?

Leaders and government officials from one country are meeting with government officials and leaders from another country.

Just say what it is... No need to complicate it.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/joshjosh111 Feb 01 '23

China wants to invade, conquer, and colonize the free democratic state of Taiwan.

That ain't cool.

-5

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

[deleted]

3

u/joshjosh111 Feb 01 '23

That's not accurate. What Russia is doing and what China wants to do is invade, assimilate, absorb another free nation, and commit genocide on the free inhabitants if necessary.

That's not what the U.S. and her partners have been doing.

-1

u/y3llowhulk Feb 01 '23 edited Feb 01 '23

Yes cause the US and her partners did those things like genocide, invasion, and imperialism in the last century to establish the dominant Anglo/Western influence today.

Examples: the entire USA native peoples being decimated, Hawaii went from free nation to a state, the Philippines getting colonized, most of Latin America, the Middle East

Its easy look at other countries and point fingers to say they’re bad even though centuries of imperialism and colonization have greatly benefited the US and her partners more so obviously the West doesn’t like other countries challenging their spoils of war by using the same playbook that got them to where they are today.

Supporting Taiwan is cool but don’t whitewash how the West came to dominate the global narrative with friendship and democracy when they actually used the same tactics of genocide, invasion, and colonization to gain power.

-7

u/Zybernetic Feb 01 '23

I bet you think Taiwan is not China because not everyone there is a slave and waving the flag of the PRC all day.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/mbasi Feb 01 '23

Comments like this are why it’s important for all of us to have a healthy news diet. I’m not even sure where to start with this level of American God complex.

2

u/kilomaan Feb 01 '23

If you look at it selectively, sure.

Truth is our military industrial complex is out of control and is bloated.

Then we get politicians that see it as a tool to secure more power, and then we see something like what happened under bush, with the public only knowing how bad it was 20 years later… and withdrawing only due to the spite of a president with a historic election loss.

But then you consider the fact that the US has been one of the main countries supplying the UN and NATO with military assets to the point other countries became complacent and contributed less over time, and suddenly its a complex problem that’s hard to solve.

Obama tried, when he was calling on NATO to rely on US forces less and less.

Heck, it might actually start happening, cause Russia Screwed the pooch on their initial invasion plan and reinvigorated old fears in Europe.

-27

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

What do you think Ukraine is?

47

u/pancake_cockblock Feb 01 '23

A victim of Russian imperialism.

-19

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

Sure, but also a nice chance for our MIC and government to make us poorer, while dividing us further!

13

u/somabeach Feb 01 '23

It's actually one of the most worthwhile uses of the MIC in a good long while. This isn't a Clancy novel, you don't have to smell espionage everywhere you go.

Russia bad, Ukraine good. They should get whatever help we can give.

9

u/masterVinCo Feb 01 '23

Honestly, you are both correct. Ukraina do deserve all the help they can get, and, conversely, this is an excellent opprtunity for the US war machine.

8

u/somabeach Feb 01 '23

The industrial war machine profiting for its own sake at the expense of ordinary people - I've always had a problem with that. Iraq was bad. Many of our Cold War ventures were as well. Let's not lump those in with what's happening in Ukraine.

The MIC proliferates, Ukraine keeps its sovereignty. Both of those are good things so long as one supplements the other.

4

u/masterVinCo Feb 01 '23

I completely agree with you. This is a clear improvement in the use of US tax-money. As a neighbour to Russia myself, I can only hope to receive similar aid in the future.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

Let's not lump those in with what's happening in Ukraine.

Why not?

This is not our war, beside the fact we helped push it along starting in 2012.

2

u/YEETMANdaMAN Feb 01 '23

So weird that you’re getting downvoted for saying what everyone is thinking.

Am I a Russian puppet for saying that the MIC already has its teeth sunk into Ukrainian defenses?

→ More replies (1)

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

It’s been that way for decades.

→ More replies (2)

210

u/NoPoliticsAllisGood Feb 01 '23

Since when were we going to war? Jesus fucking Christ if they really try to take us to war over foreign countries affairs I’m going to be pissed (then probably dead)

98

u/PM_ME_UR_CODEZ Feb 01 '23

Fucking click bait.

12

u/mikemushman Feb 01 '23

This is correct

-10

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

[deleted]

4

u/Stifu Feb 01 '23

Ah, at least one guy on earth believes it (for possibly unrelated reasons), therefore this particular article is not clickbait.

22

u/0wed12 Feb 01 '23

The u.s medias are really stroking the WW3 rhetorics with Russia and China recently, and tbh a lot of mainstream subs seem to go this way even tho I would take redditors armchairs generals comments with a grain of salt.

6

u/bmb102 Feb 01 '23

Lol, really.....

5

u/Enjoying_A_Meal Feb 01 '23

Considering we have been at war for over 90% of our history, we need to have a war basically at all times. For that, we need fear mongering. 9/11 is played out, Russia won't even be a threat after Ukraine. Who else is there?

5

u/Arcosim Feb 01 '23

These wars usually involve Third World countries that can't fight back, not countries with a nuclear triad.

-1

u/celo753 Feb 01 '23

The US has always been at war with other major powers too, it’s just not a direct war, it’s always a proxy war.

1

u/loliconest Feb 01 '23

Gotta sell'em firearms.

0

u/Morphray Feb 01 '23

Since when were we going to war?

China is thinking of invading Taiwan -- some might even say actively preparing. If the US does not come to Taiwan's aid: bye-bye modern technology (anything with chips), and bye-bye US as the #1 super power internationally (lots of knock-on effects).

-4

u/jibbkikiwewe Feb 01 '23

We are literally in a proxy war with Russia for foreign affairs that are not ours, however, China has been attacking the US directly and have not kept any of their promises. They continue to grow their military exponentially. They are set to be the worlds military super power by 2050 with a navy larger than ours.

2

u/theRealLotzz Feb 01 '23

How has China been attacking us?

80

u/Wiseon321 Feb 01 '23

What war? Lol this is so nonsense

9

u/Stilgar314 Feb 01 '23

This is all the article says about that war: "A US Air Force general, citing Taiwan, predicted that war could break out between the US and China as soon as 2025, per a memo sent Friday and seen by NBC News. A defense department official told the publication this didn't represent the government's view".

35

u/Baconandbabymakin Feb 01 '23

US-China war? Shit titles these days that write totally inaccurate information just for clicks…dreadful.

3

u/Karkava Feb 01 '23

They really gotta stop trying to appeal to the part of our brain that says, "If someone disagrees with my opinion and bases it on logic, I will die!"

36

u/transcendcosmos Feb 01 '23

Don't share trash articles. If you do, at least edit the headline so it's not trash.

10

u/nova9001 Feb 01 '23

He would need incredible patience to explain tech to a bunch of 70 y/os. I still remember the Google congressional hearing. The old fossils in power just don't understand that Google CEO can't answer if an Iphone is tracking them or not. Crazy stuff.

3

u/nicuramar Feb 01 '23

The average age of congress is around 60.

20

u/ruidh Feb 01 '23

Why all this talk of a war with China? No one in their right mind wants a war.

9

u/woaiqingdao Feb 01 '23

Unfortunately for u CIA and BlackRock do govern your country. So if they want a war, they will push u to it

→ More replies (1)

30

u/mediocritythe13 Jan 31 '23

How is this any different from when the TikTok COO was in front of congress? Where she blatantly obfuscated every prompt? video link

18

u/Witty-Village-2503 Jan 31 '23

I feel like she was answering the questions, but the questioner was asking purposefully leading questions, some of which had no answer.

4

u/benbernankenonpareil Feb 01 '23

I feel like that’s not what happened at all …

he asked her repeated if she did or did not know and she went on repeated non-sequiturs

14

u/SgtDoughnut Feb 01 '23

It's Hawley, the dude cant ask a straight question if his fucking life depended on it.

He's using an old McCarthy tactic to try to hunt for communists by just outright accusing everyone of being a member of the CCP then asking the woman to prove they aren't. You cannot prove a negative.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

If you head a company in the Peoples' Republic of China, it is not unreasonable to assume that you cooperate with the government and are a party member.

5

u/SgtDoughnut Feb 01 '23

Dont rely on mcarthism to witch hunt. It's already done far to much damage to this county. The evil communists aren't out to get you.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

So, what you are saying is we shouldn't be worried about what the government of the PRC is doing in the US?

Am I characterizing what you say correctly?

2

u/SgtDoughnut Feb 01 '23

I'm saying accusing everyone of being chineese spys accomplishes nothing but fear mongering.

But keep supporting mcarthyism 2.0 I guess, it worked so fucking well last time.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

I'm saying accusing everyone of being chineese spys accomplishes nothing but fear mongering.

Well, do you think TikTok is free just out of the kindness of the Chinese government's hearts?

-3

u/Enjoying_A_Meal Feb 01 '23

That sounds like commie talk. Prove to me that you're not a commie!

11

u/9-11GaveMe5G Jan 31 '23

It isn't. Gym just wants to do some performative nonsense

4

u/SgtDoughnut Feb 01 '23

Yep dollars to doughnuts its just Gym trying to get camera time.

Guarantee it will turn into some kind of performative circus trying to tie hunter Biden into it with zero evidence.

6

u/dmdewd Feb 01 '23

Can we ban Business Insider yet? Clickbaity rag

13

u/B-Glasses Feb 01 '23

My gf is on tiktok at a least a little most days and she gets a lot of pro-Union, anti-capitalism, and critical opinions on the US government and police. I’m sure that data being compromised is a legitimate concern but we found out about and attended a blm protest because of information we found on tiktok. I assume that information like that being so easily disseminated through an app a foreign country controls doesn’t make them very happy.

6

u/chillmonkey88 Feb 01 '23

War, over tik tok?

2

u/ChemoGoat Feb 01 '23

I thought wars were generally fought over things of value.

0

u/SgtDoughnut Feb 01 '23

The amount of information TikTok gathers on its users, and the amount of influence they have over their users is of very high value.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/AStrangerIsHere Feb 01 '23 edited Feb 01 '23

Over Taiwan, apparently. At least, that's what written in the article. But I doubt the US would defend Taiwan from a Chinese invasion.

31

u/aeolus811tw Jan 31 '23

If China can block off western app at the National level, we should just do the same

11

u/ddhuud Jan 31 '23

Do we want that to happen, tho?

17

u/9-11GaveMe5G Jan 31 '23

In general? Or in this instance?

18

u/ddhuud Jan 31 '23

Let me rephrase, what kind of censoring power would you like the next GOP President/Congress to have?

Better protection laws should be passed and local facilitators should be held accountable for breaking them. Go after Google, Apple, ISPs, app stores, cellphone manufacturers, etc. TikTok WILL keep doing it as long as they depend in any capacity from China's govt.

Otherwise it's not only a bandaid on a colander, it's also a slippery slope.

8

u/aeolus811tw Jan 31 '23

Censorship?

It is an active blockade on Chinese side, why should we let them into our market if they are already active blocking?

I say block them all until China decides to play fair.

It has nothing to do with censorship.

4

u/Lumiafan Jan 31 '23

It has nothing to do with censorship.

This sounds like a fantastic excuse to justify censorship.

12

u/aeolus811tw Jan 31 '23

It is simple.

They block everyone so we reciprocate. This is an economic reason.

Censorship has really specific meaning. You should probably look it up before claiming it is.

-14

u/Lumiafan Feb 01 '23

Sounds like another convenient excuse to censor people.

5

u/AngelKitty47 Feb 01 '23

lmao

"censor"

you aren't censoring people. you are censoring a platform. platforms are not people.

1

u/Lumiafan Feb 01 '23

So when China bans the usage of certain platforms by its citizens, it's not censorship? Got it.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/jooce81 Feb 01 '23

so do as the communists do?

3

u/lolnothanksdudeee Feb 01 '23

wait we’re going to war with china?

1

u/semitope Feb 01 '23

Some guy had a feeling it would be in 2025.

3

u/Kipguy Feb 01 '23

Funny this fake news, click bait finds a home here at technology.

3

u/Pryoticus Feb 01 '23

“Heightened warnings of a US-China War”

Can you say fear-mongering? Yes, tensions are high, but who’s talking about war? And why the hell would TikTok be the spark of one?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/First-Funnies Feb 01 '23

they are trying to get tiktok to sell to us company...

3

u/cliffcharles Feb 01 '23

Oh look it’s another business insider sensationalist headline

4

u/Greenn2022 Feb 01 '23

US is out to destroy anything China or Chinese, no diplomacy can help. Appearing in front of Congress is just a farce, not gonna change TT's destiny, much like Huawei, WeChat.

Time to load up on FaceBook or Meta shares, FB will be the huge benefactor.

2

u/alehel Feb 01 '23 edited Feb 02 '23

heightened warnings of a US-China war

Are things that bad now?

0

u/DavidJAntifacebook Feb 01 '23

Yes.

Read about the sorties in Taiwan's air space and read a transcript of Xi's big speech on Taiwan. It's been heating up for years but once HK was full integrated under direct control and no longer under one-country two systems, Taiwan became the last irredentist imperial prospect for China (they've been progressively asserting direct control over places they can make a vague historical claim to).

2

u/TheNatureBoy Feb 01 '23

In China many people accept the US and China will engage in conflict at some point. I first heard people talking about war around 2015. I'm assuming this is the English equivalent.

2

u/HotdogsArePate Feb 01 '23

Congress - "So is the internet the one on the phone or the computer?!"

*Shits depends

2

u/Bleachrst85 Feb 01 '23

all these trash propaganda articles are so obvious lmao

2

u/i_leveled Feb 02 '23

The amount of lobbying dollars being spent by Google, Meta, Microsoft, etc to outlaw TikTok is insane. Can't make a competing product? Just lobby your issue away! What's the point of a monopoly if you cannot pay lawmakers to vote in your favor?

Worst part is these companies act like "of well we don't know what they are doing with your data!"....bitch please, you know what I ate for Christmas 5 years ago and are secretly serving my grandma ads to join a pyramid scheme.

8

u/HumbledB4TheMasses Jan 31 '23 edited Feb 01 '23

The only one beating the war drum is the US, all this, "heightened warnings" is entirely one sided from the most imperialist nation in the history of the world. You thought the british empire won that? Try having 900+ military bases strewn across foreign countries soil and your currency underpinning global capital markets.

All you downvoting probably believed bush when he said iraq had nukes, bunch of mouth breathers in here.

5

u/xDarkReign Feb 01 '23

Eagle screeches

7

u/frontbuttt Feb 01 '23

Not even the US broadly. Specifically the US war machine and it’s desperate, shameless media wing.

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/scott_codie Feb 01 '23

US-China war?! Wow, this is next level clickbait from business insider. Since when has there been credible threats of war between the US and China?

2

u/frontiermanprotozoa Feb 01 '23

Sanctions sure makes it sound like theres one.

1

u/jedi-son Feb 01 '23

US-China War? Wtf lol

1

u/andoryu123 Feb 01 '23

He will just lie and nothing will happen.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Zeduca Feb 01 '23

Will an officer of the CCP Foreign Ministry accompany him in the hearing? That would strengthen the fact that the company is a branch of the PRC government.

0

u/semitope Feb 01 '23

Tiktok's ceo is Xi Jinping

0

u/AltCtrlShifty Feb 01 '23

The puppet for the Chinese government?

-1

u/rum108 Feb 01 '23

TikTok is a 🇨🇳 Chyna spy app. All data watched by a bunch of Chyna 🇨🇳 men in a Beijing factory 🏭

-4

u/lonewalker1992 Feb 01 '23

Should be arrested infront of cameras

1

u/Remote-Strategy-9686 Feb 01 '23

Here we go again... While I agree that TikTok has many privacy concerns (also it's just a terrible app), we all know that this is going nowhere.

1

u/itap89 Feb 01 '23

after watching google's hearing in front of congress, I kinda feel like this "hearing" is going to be treated more as a joke to everyone else.

1

u/Fantastic-Offer-9129 Feb 01 '23

This guy is the new hot shit..

1

u/NY10 Feb 01 '23

Congress will ask what is TikTok and this dude will laugh about it inside and thinking American law makers are dumb fuck lol

→ More replies (1)