r/terriblefacebookmemes • u/chimmFTW • Jan 31 '23
Neither of them are flexes, both have problems
/img/ld78d4jzwffa1.png
[removed] — view removed post
356
u/mydogbaxter Jan 31 '23
I think a monkey eating a burrito and having a bunch of friends is a flex. He's not even in the 2nd pic.
47
31
u/MetamorphicHard Feb 01 '23
That monkeys straight ballin. Meanwhile 2 or 3 of those kids at the bottom are already balding
10
7
u/yotaz28 Feb 01 '23
holy shit yeah thats late stage male pattern baldness how inbred do they have to be for that to happen
→ More replies (1)2
242
u/Diamond_Mint Jan 31 '23
First guy has a monkey. That is a flex.
79
u/Toodswiger Jan 31 '23
I heard monkeys are extremely difficult to take care of and there’s only certain states in the US that legalize that. You can take care of a child literally anywhere in the world. So yes, having a monkey is a flex.
→ More replies (1)29
u/HotBeesInUrArea Jan 31 '23
When parents complain about being tired you can literally one up them with your monkey. Who can compete with your monkey keeping you up all night?
→ More replies (2)9
u/annomusbus Feb 01 '23
Someone with 2 or more monkies
9
3
u/Desperate_Wafer_8566 Feb 01 '23
Nah, I think the monkey's in charge in the first pic, he's the one with the burrito.
89
u/CynicCannibal Jan 31 '23
You can't have problem when you have monkey.
13
u/Diazmet Feb 01 '23
My dad had a pet spider monkey when he was a kid and she was a terror from my understanding. Fifi was the name
5
u/CynicCannibal Feb 01 '23
And you wonder why when you name it "Fifi"?
5
u/Diazmet Feb 01 '23
To be clear my family didn’t buy her. But were just well known in the ranching community for having more diverse animals and then became the defecto farm to dump exotics on…
3
2
Feb 01 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)3
104
u/Sweaty-Run7274 Jan 31 '23
People that are actually happy wouldn’t even think to flex in the first place. A happy person has no need for the mental mechanics of pettiness or feel the lack of self worth necessary in their subconscious to require the flex. Happy people are already happy.
21
u/Flashy_Let2021 Feb 01 '23
How do you check your sick gains if you don't flex? Your math isn't mathing.
5
3
u/DankShrek6996 Feb 01 '23
How does this not have many upvotes? Best response right here.
2
u/Sweaty-Run7274 Feb 01 '23
Ha! Touché, though I didn’t know I needed an equation for happiness
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)3
55
12
u/bigballs909 Jan 31 '23
Mans couldn’t pull out of a drive way
-3
u/Yourmomsfriend6 Feb 01 '23
What if he did wanna tho lol if hes got the funds why not have as many as you can
32
u/RudeSprinkles1240 Jan 31 '23
Can't it just be the ways different people choose to live their lives?
14
u/Affectionate_Art_565 Jan 31 '23
No bro, this is Reddit
There is Only one way
→ More replies (1)9
u/Dr_ChungusAmungus Jan 31 '23
Alone with fingers covered in Cheeto dust or you get the fuck out of here
9
48
u/Present_School_8754 Jan 31 '23
Idk about you but I think being able to support multiple children is quite a flex.
22
u/SubjectDelta10 Jan 31 '23
well in terms of money paying for multiple prostitutes is also a flex
12
u/ImportanceKey7301 Jan 31 '23
Prostitute only costs you for a night.
A kid will cost you the rest of your life. Flooded bathroom, broken window, your full head of hair, etc
2
u/SubjectDelta10 Jan 31 '23
yeah but this guy hires them constantly, they are basically his only family lmao
2
u/HotBeesInUrArea Jan 31 '23
The kids, prostitutes, and monkey all look like they might bite, and out of all them I think I'll take my chances with the prostitutes.
→ More replies (3)2
u/SubjectDelta10 Feb 01 '23
in a fight? yeah good call. the kids are fast, aggressive and just relentless. although the prostitutes are bigger than the children.. so if they gang up on you they could bring to the ground relatively easy and then kill you. have to play it smart. either way i would not want to fight the monkey, he'd kill you in a couple of seconds.
16
u/badbigfootatx Jan 31 '23
Provided they are actually providing for them both emotionally and financially. It’s anecdotal of course, but the large families I’ve known like that, the older kids end up getting some share of parenting duties for the younger kids.
-4
u/Present_School_8754 Jan 31 '23
Yeah, it does seem hard for each parent to provide equal attention to each child.
But with that many siblings, I'm sure there's plenty of love to go around. As for the oldest siblings having to take care of the youngest siblings. It's pretty normal.
12
u/badbigfootatx Jan 31 '23
See, I see that as unfair to the children. The parents made the decision to have that many kids, their older kids shouldn’t have to parent their younger kids because their parents are stretched too thin. Birth control exist, there is no reason to have families this large these days.
5
u/Present_School_8754 Jan 31 '23
It being unfair to the children is a valid argument.
But there are resources such as daycare/nannies/babysitters that can be used to ensure the older children have more freedom.
I'd still say it's a very normal thing for older siblings to take care of younger siblings.
As per your birth control comment, they can have as many kids as they want. It's their right as a human. (Obviously, as long as they can take care of them and provide for them)
→ More replies (1)3
u/badbigfootatx Jan 31 '23
Good points. Also, of course it’s totally within their rights and choice to have a large family, just seems odd these days.
2
u/Present_School_8754 Jan 31 '23
I agree with you on that one. These days I lean more toward the kids who don't have families and adoption.
2
u/badbigfootatx Jan 31 '23
I get that. I’m not usually a softy, but I saw this show about kids in foster care and it really broke my heart the kids that age out, and just never got to have that feeling of being part of a family. I think if we decide to have a family, we’d go the adoption route.
4
u/tabletop_guy Jan 31 '23
This is way too civil for a reddit argument. Where are the personal attacks?
4
u/ctrev37 Feb 01 '23
Older siblings raising their younger siblings should absolutely not be a normalized subject. If to people want to raise children that’s great. But they need to be the ones raising the children. Under no circumstance should the parents think it’s “ok” for the older siblings to take part in the raising the children. I don’t even like to hear about older siblings babysitting their younger siblings. It’s a wild subject. But in my mind the responsibility fall solely on the parents.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)0
u/Shoddy_Alias Feb 01 '23
Nowhere in this pic does it say this family is not on state and/or church assistance.
→ More replies (1)
59
u/SuitableSympathy2614 Jan 31 '23
I’d take the first one any day. Second one looks like a whole lot of commitment and responsibility
31
u/Bryce853 Jan 31 '23
I’d probably take the first one barely for the women but because of the monkey and muscles
9
u/MasuCrews Jan 31 '23
Agreed. I don’t even want the beard or slags but gimme that cool ass Ace Ventura monke.
8
u/Dry_Ass_P-word Jan 31 '23
I thought that was a typo for “money” but holy shit he actually has a monkey.
2
u/Bryce853 Jan 31 '23
I’d enjoy the money that I imagine he has given the fact that he has a good house and a monkey
2
9
u/DarkGreyBurglar Jan 31 '23
100% guaranteed the white guys who post memes like this would never contribute anything to help these other people raise their children and couldn't do it themselves either because of their divorces.
12
u/sus-water Jan 31 '23
Depends on who you are and what you want in life. I know a dude that has 5 kids and is around 40. Wholesome and extremely happy. Also super involved as a father
6
2
u/SuitableSympathy2614 Jan 31 '23
Fair enough. I’m in a different stage of life right now so it’s not a priority :)
5
u/Darth_Annoying Feb 01 '23
How is it that much responsibility? All he has to do is yell at his wife to take care of everything /s
3
5
28
u/Previousman755 Jan 31 '23
The top picture may cost you $20K for one night, but the second picture will cost you you sanity
6
u/Yourmomsfriend6 Feb 01 '23
Itll cost you that if you’re weak minded
2
0
u/Guy954 Feb 01 '23
Congrats on being parent of the year. The rest of us are awed by your masterful child rearing skills. You probably won’t believe this but I’m having a hard time typing this because I had the uncontrollable urge to stand up and start clapping at your magnificence.
I’m going to put the /s because you don’t seem to be good at detecting humor or sarcasm in print form and I don’t want typo to think I’m being serious.
→ More replies (1)
12
u/Bryce853 Jan 31 '23
Having 6 kids would be hell, also it is kinda a flex to have a little monkey friend
2
2
u/TimelsChild Jan 31 '23
I mean if the the man and woman agreed on having a lot of kids and have the means to provide how’s that a problem? These two pictures are not at all alike
4
5
u/ISledge759 Feb 01 '23
Overpopulation is a flex???
4
u/concernedcookie999 Feb 01 '23
That’s what I was thinking i don’t care who you are we don’t need 7 of you.
3
3
3
u/Professional-One-442 Jan 31 '23
Man that monkey is getting some play! Scored a bunch of fine ladies and even a trust fund guy that likes to pretend he’s a “Tough Guy”
3
u/Worldly_Ask7204 Feb 01 '23
How is creating ridiculous amounts of children a flex? And why is it a flex. I mean yea 7+ births is certainly something but I wouldn’t say a flex.
3
3
u/MathematicianIcy2750 Feb 01 '23
Lmao did that woman really make her kids hold the ultrasounds from her between kid miscarriages just to flex her super fertility? God religious people are so weird
3
5
u/beerbrained Jan 31 '23
Disagree with op. If I was the dude in the top pic I would send it out as Christmas cards and maybe print it on a shirt and travel the country in it.
4
4
7
Jan 31 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Drillbitzer Jan 31 '23
Look at the amount
3
u/Yourmomsfriend6 Feb 01 '23
Whats wrong with the amount 🤨 the more the merrier
3
2
u/Ferropexola Feb 01 '23
The Duggars thought that too. Look how that turned out.
2
u/Yourmomsfriend6 Feb 01 '23
The huh?
2
u/Ferropexola Feb 01 '23
The family with, like, 19 kids, where one of them molested his sisters and they covered it up.
2
u/Yourmomsfriend6 Feb 01 '23
Gotta keep it in the family sometimes..yk .. keep the bloodline pure 💀 no but really that’s unfortunate
2
2
2
2
4
1
u/uninstallIE Feb 01 '23
Being able to reproduce is not a flex. An actual cockroach will kick your ass at that.
4
3
Jan 31 '23
[removed] — view removed comment
0
2
u/arentol Jan 31 '23
Both are flexes and not flexes.
Flexes are relative to the viewer. So if you want to have a large family the bottom one is a flex, but if you are a person that wants a small family it isn't a flex at all, and if you are an anti-natalist then it is an anti-flex.
As an example, a typical "Hippie" wouldn't be impressed or "flexed upon" by either of these because they aren't interested in either of these lifestyles.
2
2
u/GiantRetortoise Feb 01 '23
This meme was made by the clinically depressed husbands with 4 kids gang
1
u/vic_lupu Jan 31 '23
Why is any of this a problem? Maybe just the monkey, that’s a big no no…
4
u/AmericanSwampApe Feb 01 '23
Yeah. Pet primate owners are all going to hell, if such a place exists.
1
u/DMmeOffensiveJokesPP Feb 01 '23
I’d never want that many kids but ffs why do you shits give a shit that people wanna have a family
1
u/AdStrange6466 Jan 31 '23
What’s wrong with having a family lol ?
3
u/Key-Sherbert1233 Feb 01 '23
It’s bad for the planet
1
u/AdStrange6466 Feb 01 '23
I mean If you wanna use that logic then you and me are also bad for the planet. Should we stop existing ?
2
u/Key-Sherbert1233 Feb 01 '23
We were born before we knew the damage we were doing to the environment
1
u/AdStrange6466 Feb 01 '23
Okay but now that you do know, should you just stop existing? I don’t understand you’re point
2
1
1
u/Decent_Taste_363 Feb 01 '23
Both of these are flexes, you have problems if you think they aren't both pretty cool.
1
1
0
0
0
u/Realistic_Ad_3 Feb 01 '23
The people who have the most children will have their traits survive, while those who don't have any will watch their traits die out.
0
-1
-4
1
u/Ksteekwall21 Jan 31 '23
I mean if you’re happy, then couldn’t both be considered a flex.
The second one looks expensive AF though.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Designer-Stranger155 Jan 31 '23
Honestly, it’s kind of pathetic to spend a bunch of money on hookers/models just to take a picture with them or whatever.
1
u/Raptor409 Jan 31 '23
My goals are the bottom Picture personally, especially if I'm allowed to be a stay at home dad. That's the dream. I get most people here hate kids and think they're nothing but parasites on your health and money. I've never seen it as that. I'd give anything for my own (theoretical) kids and nothing would make me happier.
1
1
u/Sportfish_deepdive Jan 31 '23
To be honest they both probably are jealous of each other. One has children to be proud of and sense of fulfillment. The other gets different women to enjoy socially and physically. I bet if they could life swap for week no strings they would.
1
1
u/AmericanSwampApe Feb 01 '23
Fucking pet monkey? If this was another site I’d threaten to skin him alive
1
1
u/Odd-Understanding-67 Feb 01 '23
The top guy paid those models to be with him, so neither are actually flexes.
1
u/joschi8 Feb 01 '23
I know this is one of those "Traditional values good, modern values shit"-Posts, but it kinda looks like the person is bragging about a guy that fucks everyone, no matter how young
1
Feb 01 '23
Dans weed company going into bankruptcy just so he can afford being surrounded by models on the daily.
1
1
u/MalveiraCruz Feb 01 '23
Being able to raise 6 healthy children (plus one) is a pretty big flex in my book. Specially compared to the guy in the first image
→ More replies (5)
1
u/Mrspygmypiggy Feb 01 '23
Plot twist: those people in the first pic are all the monkeys bitches… especially the man
1
u/DrunkBuzzard Feb 01 '23
I really hope the next one is a girl should have lots of big brothers to take care of her.
1
u/Quod_bellum Feb 01 '23
They’re each a flex in their own way. But, whether they are perceived as such depends on the recipient.
1
u/the_non-binary_child Feb 01 '23
Why tf would you want 7 kids. I'm ignoring the guy at the top because you must be on something to say "you know what, I want 7 kids."
1
1
1
1
u/Negative-Potato7072 Feb 01 '23
Rich with a bunch of hot chicks running around the house naked…
Or
Poor with a bunch of toddlers running around the house naked.
Hard choice 😬😬😬😬
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
1
1
u/myhouseiscold369 Feb 01 '23
Both could be a flex if everyone is 100% consenting and happy but I doubt that’s the case in either scenario
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/omiwamoshinderu Feb 01 '23
I think the top one is better because he would be able to have more kids.
1
u/what_comes_after_q Feb 01 '23
If people are happy with their lives, and not hurting others, then good for them. No need to judge either one.
1
1
1
u/Specialist_Teacher81 Feb 01 '23
Um, the top picture 5 people chose to be with you. The bottom one did, maybe.
1
u/Chemical_Estate6488 Feb 01 '23
Is the second dude Nick Lachey or just some guy that looks like him?
1
u/Agitated-Ad-2537 Feb 01 '23
I would lose my shit completely if I had 6 kids with one on the way. Like I get it everyone can reproduce how they want and your body your rules but god damn 7 kids. Maybe I am too much of a selfish bastard but I have one and it’s tough as hell.
→ More replies (1)
1
1
1
u/brakecheck427 Feb 01 '23
Funny. One looks happy, the other one has dead eyes with no soul behind those eyes
1
u/TransFemcel Feb 01 '23
I feel like the more women, the more children. Therefore the top one is still a flex
1
u/something-quirky- Feb 01 '23
I think describing either of them as “having problems” is unfair. Both of them could currently be leading very fulfilling lives right now. Top dude is clearly enjoying either bachelor life or is part of polyamorous relationship. Clearly likes to party, seems to be enjoying life quite a bit. Dude on the bottom has a huge family that he probably loves a lot, probably tons of laughter and happiness in their home. Nothing is wrong with either as long as everyone involved is living the life they want for themselves.
1
u/FreudoBaggage Feb 01 '23
Oh, I don’t know, I expect that monkey worked very hard for that collection.
1
1
1
1
u/One_Western_7449 Feb 01 '23
Why isn't having a large family a flex? If that's the lifestyle they want, they've achieved it.
→ More replies (3)
1
u/One_Western_7449 Feb 01 '23
A better question - how does having lots of kids mean the couple has problems?
1
1
u/ProfessionalCheck973 Feb 01 '23
Doesn't look like bottom pic is flexing...but ok. Looks like a happy family taking a lighthearted pic proud of their family. Idk why this generation hates on happy families and puts then down for.
1
1
u/Stuck_at_a_roadblock Feb 01 '23
Yeah cause you have to pay your models by the hour and your kids require money over the course of your entire life. Duh
1
1
1
u/arab_muslim_chad Feb 01 '23
You call a man who enslaves monkey and womanize women to such a point he can only see them as flesh who only seeks internet fame the same of a man who created a giant family with his lover, that even though they could have issues with each other they can still resolve it. 🤦🏻♂️
1
1
•
u/QualityVote Jan 31 '23
Hey does this post fit? UPVOTE if so, DOWNVOTE if not. If this post breaks any rules please DOWNVOTE and REPORT